So, I was a lot closer to having this “mostly” working than I thought. After some trial and error with 7zips command line arguments I got a few good test runs in. I need to work with some different data to further confirm, but so far, it seems that 7zip is pure win!

winzip-vs-7zip

See the text results below:

Starting WinZip…
WinZip finished… reporting…

Start Ticks: 633616615839494087
End ticks: 633616615845744327
Time to completion (ticks): 6250240
Time to completion (ms): 625.024

Starting 7Zip…
7Zip finished… reporting…

Start Ticks: 633616615846681863
End ticks: 633616615859338599
Time to completion (ticks): 12656736
Time to completion (ms): 1265.6736

Press esc or enter key too continue…

Starting 7Zip…
7Zip finished… reporting…

Start Ticks: 633616617982545127
End ticks: 633616618061454407
Time to completion (ticks): 78909280
Time to completion (ms): 7890.928

a 7zip with max compression?

Starting 7Zip…
7Zip finished… reporting…

Start Ticks: 633616621970019726
End ticks: 633616622006270886
Time to completion (ticks): 36251160
Time to completion (ms): 3625.116

Go straight to Post

One Response to “WinZip vs 7zip: First round – Misc Textual Documents”

  1. 7zip is definitely win. In compressed archives with a lot files (1000′s), I’ve had 7zip decompress at least twice as fast as WinZip, with almost the exact some compression percentage.

Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

© 2010 iDevelop Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha